Carbon Markets

Carbon Markets

SEC climate disclosures
Carbon Markets

SEC proposes landmark climate risk disclosures for US companies

Today’s climate disclosure announcement by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is the first step towards comprehensive climate regulation for US public companies.  In a landmark announcement on March 21, the US financial market regulator unveiled a plan for climate-related risk and greenhouse gas disclosure requirements for listed companies in the country. It includes the mandatory reporting of Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions, as well as any material impacts climate-related risks can have on the company’s business, strategy and outlook, such as physical and regulatory exposures. “I am pleased to support today’s proposal because, if adopted, it would provide investors with consistent, comparable, and decision-useful information for making their investment decisions, and it would provide consistent and clear reporting obligations for issuers,” said SEC Chair Gary Gensler. GHG emissions and decarbonization initiatives According to the proposed rules, listed companies would be required to disclose information about: their governance of climate-related risks and relevant risk management processes; how any climate-related risks they have identified have had or are likely to have a material impact on their business and consolidated financial statements over the short-, medium-, or long-term; how any identified climate-related risks have affected or are likely to affect their strategy, business model, and outlook; the impact of climate-related events (severe weather events and other natural conditions) and transition activities on the line items of their consolidated financial statements, as well as on the financial estimates and assumptions used in the financial statements. Additionally, all companies subjected to these requirements would have to disclose information about their direct greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (Scope 1) and indirect emissions from purchased electricity (Scope 2), while the largest companies and those with an established GHG reduction target that includes Scope 3 emissions would also have to disclose those emissions from upstream and downstream activities in its value chain. In a sample letter sent to companies last September about the proposed changes, the SEC mentioned that companies should align their financial filings with their corporate social responsibility (CSR) or environmental social and governance (ESG) reporting, including the disclosure of any significant greenhouse gas reduction initiatives and their cost. Additionally, the letter said companies may be required to disclose “material effects of transition risks related to climate change” that may affect their business, financial condition, and results of operations, including policy and regulatory changes, market trends, credit risks and technological changes. “The proposed disclosures are similar to those that many companies already provide based on broadly accepted disclosure frameworks, such as the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures and the Greenhouse Gas Protocol,” said the SEC in a press release about the new rules. The purpose of the new rulebook is to harmonize the data companies give their investors around the risks that climate change represents for their business. What this could mean for corporate decarbonization in the US Gregory Kasin, Commercial Manager, US, at ClimateTrade, notes: “Unfortunately, in the past 30 years the US has taken a backseat in regards to addressing the externality associated with GHG emissions on a global scale. There have been many regional efforts in regards to establishing emissions trading, such as in California. However, on a national or international level the US has fallen behind other countries (especially in Europe) in establishing effective legislation to combat climate change.”  He adds: “The SEC’s recommendation for requiring the disclosures of corporations’ GHG emissions is a major step forward in getting the US once again engaged in the fight against climate change. As more people begin to understand the impact of this crisis, requiring public disclosures of emissions will provide transparency and hold companies accountable to do their part. It will reward conscientious companies since customers will choose to do business with them and raise the bar for others to do more.” Investors’ ESG pressure This move is part of President Biden’s focus on climate change, but was also largely driven by investor pressure. The SEC published its initial guidance in 2010 on how companies should disclose their climate change risks in their financial filings, but it has not historically taken significant enforcement action with respect to these disclosures.  This guidance remains in effect today, and it involves the disclosure of certain material direct and indirect risks presented by the physical impacts of climate change, increased climate change regulation, business trends, and other matters. Since its publication, investors have been asking for additional disclosure requirements, as they require an increasing amount of clear and comparable environmental data to comply with their own ESG criteria. Disclosing climate-related risk exposure has been a requirement for listed companies of more than 500 employees in the European Union since 2018, but there had been no sign of such a legislative measure in the United States until today. More on this topic: Financial institutions must do more against climate change New IPCC report urges inclusive and holistic action Next steps The new SEC rulebook will now go through a period of public feedback, with plans to finalize the document by the end of 2022. It is likely to encounter a lot of resistance, as many corporate representatives have expressed fears about the added regulatory burden it would place on US companies.  If you would like to know more about how your company can prepare for upcoming changes in SEC climate disclosures requirements, please contact us.

ESG criteria buildings
Carbon Markets

Advanced ESG criteria for new and retrofitted buildings

Europe’s Level(s) initiative introduces advanced ESG criteria to allow better assessment of new and retrofitted buildings. These have been developed to support green public procurement policies and the construction sector’s sustainable financing. One of the goals of this initiative is to harmonize the vocabulary around building sustainability, as well as the methodology for calculating buildings’ carbon footprint. This footprint, which indicates global warming contribution potential, is measured in CO2 equivalent units per indoor surface unit, in order to assess potential emissions reduction and offsetting plans along a 50-year reference period. ESG criteria standardization   This political initiative applies the principles of the circular economy and life cycle analysis to buildings, whether residential or commercial, and whether existing, retrofitted or new. Level(s) is not a certification system, but provides a limited framework of parameters surrounding the main aspects of the sustainability of a construction project, with the purpose of standardizing the calculation methodology and facilitating the verification or certification of results by third parties. Spain’s Institute of Construction Technology (ITeC) organized an informational event on February 23 2022, attended by ClimateTrade, to explore the meaning of the Level(s) building sustainability assessment and measurement indicators. The carbon footprint of buildings The carbon footprint indicator measures the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with a building at different phases along its life cycle. As such, it measures the building’s contribution to the Earth’s global warming and the effects of climate change. This indicator takes into account the life cycle from “cradle” (the extraction of raw materials used to build the building) to “grave” (the demolition of the building and approach to reusing, recycling and disposing of materials). This process is sometimes called carbon footprint assessment or life cycle carbon measurement. More on this topic: Real estate sector begins to devalue unsustainable buildings  Net Zero: From aspiration to auditable strategy Green public procurement Environmental criteria are starting to be integrated into European administrations’ procurement processes. Basic sustainability, carbon impact measurement, materials, water, health comfort and climate change indicators along a building’s life cycle have become selection criteria for public procurement and assessment criteria for the valuation of public funds’ real estate portfolios. Let’s not forget that Europe’s buildings are responsible for: 1/2 of all materials extraction 1/2 of total energy consumption 1/3 of water consumption  1/3 of waste generation  ITeC-ClimateTrade partnership Since 2020, ITeC and ClimateTrade have been developing an innovative digital solution to simplify the work of public and private, residential and commercial building managers: in their asset management activities, these professionals receive the carbon footprint of their buildings at any stage in their life cycle and offset it in part or entirely thanks to a digital connection to the ClimateTrade marketplace. This innovation presents building companies, promoters, real estate managers and investment companies with an advanced digital service for the offsetting of CO2 emissions as calculated by ITeC’s software, offering maximum accuracy and traceability in transactions for carbon-neutral certification. This is an added-value service for compliance and CSR managers, making the work of semi-automating mandatory sustainability reports easier. It also involves a quality improvement in the sector’s digitization, awarding it more transparency around environmental, social and governance responsibility for the benefit of all its stakeholders. Need more information? Contact our experts. Article written by Francisco Martín, Head of Engineering and International Key Accounts Manager at ClimateTrade.

EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism
Carbon Markets

Everything you need to know about the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism

Confused about the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism? We tell you everything you need to know in this article.  (Edit: this article has now been updated in our 2023 version: How the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism – CBAM is Evolving) In a bid to accelerate European decarbonisation and meet the EU’s target to cut emissions by 55% in 2030 compared to 1990 levels, the European Commission has proposed several measures to incentivize producers to pollute less and remain on EU soil. One of them is the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, which would place a carbon tariff on electricity, cement, aluminium, fertilizer and iron and steel products imported from outside the EU, thus leveling the playing field for European producers and avoiding “carbon leakage”. How would it be priced? The price of the tariff would depend on the amount of emissions generated by the product and on the price difference between carbon in the EU and in the country or region the product comes from. It would be paid by EU importers of non-EU products. It is initially focused on direct emissions from production (scope 1), but could be extended to scopes 2 and 3 after a transition period. When would it be implemented? The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism would come into force in 2026 after a three-year transition (but proposed changes would move this date forward to 2025). The implementation of this mechanism would coincide with the phasing out of free allowances under the EU ETS, meaning that EU polluters would be forced to truly reduce or offset emissions, since moving production elsewhere would not spare them from the carbon price. Who would be most impacted? Within the EU, Bulgaria, Ireland and Greece are the countries most reliant on non-EU imports in sectors included in the mechanism: if it were implemented today, more than 50% of their imports would be subjected to the tariff. In Spain, this number would be close to 40%.  Research suggests that the majority of products included in the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism come from Russia, Turkey, the UK and China. Countries that have their own carbon price in place could be partially exempted from the mechanism, as importers would be able to deduct the exporting country’s carbon tax from the EU tariff. These include the UK, China and South Korea, though the level of exemption would depend on the carbon tax in place and the sectors covered. What has been the global reaction? Several countries have criticized the EU proposal, including Russia, India, Brazil and China, and some have threatened to denounce it to the World Trade Organization, which could lead to litigation. Some European industry groups have argued that the legislation would undermine the competitiveness of EU companies. The proposal was announced in July 2021, and is currently being debated at the European Parliament. Interestingly, the proposed changes would make the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism more radical, with an earlier implementation date and more products included in the scheme. The proposal now has to be debated among member states.  How can ClimateTrade help? As a European-based blockchain marketplace for climate, ClimateTrade is deeply connected with the EU carbon market. Contact our team if you need help to understand how this measure would affect your company.

EU ETS
Carbon Markets

EU ETS: What is it and why is it changing?

The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) is the continent’s main tool for reducing its greenhouse gas emissions. Learn how it works and why it is changing as part of the European Green Deal. The EU ETS was launched in 2005 and currently accounts for more than three-quarters of international carbon trading, making it the world’s largest carbon market. It covers specific gases and sectors where emissions can be accurately calculated: electricity and heat generation, energy-intensive industry sectors including oil refineries, steel works, and production of iron, aluminium, metals, cement, lime, glass, ceramics, pulp, paper, cardboard, acids and bulk organic chemicals, and commercial aviation within the European Economic Area. How does the EU ETS work The system works on a cap and trade basis, meaning that organizations are only allowed to emit a certain amount of emissions, past which they need to purchase emissions allowances from others that haven’t met their emissions limits. Each allowance is equivalent to one ton of carbon dioxide (CO2), the most common greenhouse gas, and companies can trade allowances (also called EUA) with each other according to their needs. If we assume that the limit is set at 10 tons of CO2 (10tCO2) and a company only emits 6tCO2 in a given year, it can either keep the remaining 4tCO2 for its future needs, or sell it at the end of the year to companies that need more than their allocated 10tCO2. At the end of each year, companies must have acquired enough allowances to cover all  their emissions, or they may be subject to heavy penalties. How much do allowances (EUA) cost The price of a ton of CO2 is currently about €80, having more than doubled in the past year. This price is expected to rise exponentially in the coming years as countries prepare to meet their 2030 targets. According to the Carbon Tracker Initiative, if the European Union’s emissions are to remain in line with international targets for preventing climate change, the price of CO2 emissions will have to rise to redirect public and private investment towards production models that help decarbonize the economy. Revision of the EU ETS As part of the European Green Deal being implemented within the EU to reach climate neutrality by 2050, the EU ETS is being revised to accelerate the transition. In order to meet the EU’s 2030 decarbonization targets, the sectors covered by the EU ETS need to cut their emissions by 43% compared to 2005 levels. In the next 10 years, emissions allowances under the scheme will decrease at a rate of 2.2% per year, compared to 1.74% before. Free allocations (the authorization to emit a certain amount of emissions without having to pay for allowances) will continue until 2030, with a distinction for sectors identified as most at risk of relocating production overseas, particularly manufacturing. Companies in this sector will continue to receive free allocations to avoid their relocation to countries where emissions are cheaper. Meanwhile, for other sectors, free allocations will be phased out after 2026 from a maximum of 30% to 0 in 2030. Other measures are also being considered to avoid so-called “carbon leakage”, whereby companies stop emitting within the EU but simply move their carbon emissions elsewhere. One of these measures is the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. How to sell or buy CO2 emission rights ClimateTrade has a qualified and experienced team that operates with a broad base of industrial partners. We provide information, knowledge, and guidance to access markets for Emission Allowances (EUAs), Carbon Credits (CERs), Reduction Units (ERUs) and Voluntary Reductions (VERs) in a simple, equitable and efficient way. For further information on this service, please contact us.

Corporate event
Carbon Markets

How to make your events carbon-neutral

Events are an important part of industry collaboration, but they come with a significant CO2 emissions footprint. Here is our guide to make your events carbon-neutral. The Meetings, Incentives, Congress and Events (MICE) sector has been through a lot in recent months. As the pandemic hit and lockdowns were implemented, almost all events had to move from in-person to online. In the past year, mass Covid-19 vaccinations helped the revival of physical gatherings, but travel and agglomeration rules remain very volatile. It is a tumultuous time for the industry, but that shouldn’t spare event organizers from having to reduce the environmental impact of their gatherings. As an example, the 2018 UN Climate Change Conference is estimated to have emitted around 55,000 tons of CO2, not counting the travel emissions from its more than 30,000 participants. As with every other sector, scrutiny is growing around the climate strategy of companies, and MICE professionals should also start moving toward carbon neutrality. Luckily, there are now many tools available to help calculate, reduce and offset the carbon footprint of events.   Calculate CO2 emissions There are four main areas to take into account in calculating the emissions associated with an event: travel, accommodation, venue and food.  How far do your speakers and attendees have to travel to come to your event, and how will they travel? To calculate GHG emissions from travel, you can divide your attendees in different categories: long-haul flight, short flight, bus, train or car ride, and count emissions based on the number of kilometres traveled. According to some estimations, travel can represent up to three quarters of an event’s carbon footprint, so this is the most important culprit. Then, it is time to look at accommodation for your event participants. Most people stay in hotels, but there are some differences in carbon emissions depending on the classification of hotels (a 5-star hotel tends to have a larger footprint than a 1-star hotel). Luckily, the hotel sector has made significant improvements in terms of energy efficiency: according to the Cornell Hotel Sustainability Benchmarking Index 2021, GHG intensity per square meter in hotels worldwide decreased by more than 6% between 2017 and 2019. But this is still an important element in the carbon footprint of events. The third question is: where are you having your event? A venue’s carbon footprint depends on its size, energy consumption and type of electricity it uses. Ask your venue provider about the place’s ratio of conventional versus renewable energy sources, and make sure you consider the season of your event when calculating energy use (winter and summer are generally more energy-intensive due to heating and cooling necessities). Last but not least, what kind of food are you serving? Animal products (particularly beef) have a larger carbon footprint than plant-based foods. On the other hand, buffets tend to lead to a lot more food waste than plated meals, which also impacts GHG emissions.   Reduce your footprint Now that you know the main culprits in the carbon footprint of events, it is time to look at ways to reduce it.  Considering the weight of travel in an event’s overall carbon footprint, it might be a good idea to consider a hybrid model, whereby most speakers and a small audience are present physically, but everything is available online to those who want to participate from home. This will not only reduce your carbon bill, but also tremendously increase your reach. Many events have experimented with this model successfully since the pandemic. Making your event hybrid also reduces the carbon footprint from accommodation, venue and food, since you will need to cater for fewer people. But you might also look for sustainable venues that use renewable electricity and implement energy efficiency measures. Finally, a plant-based menu is the best way to cut the emissions from the food you serve.    Offset emissions and contribute to projects worldwide But no matter how much you try to reduce the environmental impact of your event, it is likely that some emissions will be impossible to avoid. In order to propose a truly carbon-neutral event, you will also need to offset your remaining carbon emissions by financing mitigation initiatives such as reforestation projects or new renewable energy developments. ClimateTrade is a strategic carbon neutrality partner for the MICE sector. For instance, we recently collaborated with Algorand to offset the carbon footprint of the Decipher event in Miami, thanks to the offsetting of 627 tons of CO2 via reforestation projects in El Salvador, Colombia and the US on the ClimateTrade digital marketplace. The amount of emissions included in the calculation stemmed from the flights (international and national) of 450 attendants, road transportation, two nights’ accommodation, the materials used for the exhibition spaces, wifi devices, electricity consumption, catering and waste generated. Another example of event management best practice is that of the business association LIDE in Argentina. LIDE is compensating the carbon footprint of all its events and webinars since 2020 through the purchase of carbon credits via ClimateTrade. By doing so, it is contributing to various reforestation projects in Latin America.   ClimateTrade in the MICE sector  ClimateTrade is also developing strategic alliances with the MICE sector and the business travel industry. In May 2021, the Spanish Association of Business Travel Agencies (GEBTA), started offering new premium services to its end clients, thanks to ClimateTrade technology. Now, corporations committed to decarbonizing their activities and operations, can begin offsetting the carbon footprint of their business trips and MICE activities. This agreement marked a shift in corporate travel agencies’ corporate social responsibility strategies: from simply offering sustainability consulting services to their clients, that have begun implementing practical tools to enable them to offset their emissions on every trip. By doing so, these agencies are reinforcing their own sustainability commitments, and powering their clients’ strategies. ………………………… Contact our experts to begin planning your carbon-neutral event. ………………………… This article was written with the support of Francisco Martin, Head of Engineering at ClimateTrade and manager of the

carbon neutral products
Carbon Markets

What are carbon-neutral products and services?

Consumers and regulators are increasingly  demanding transparency on the environmental impact of the products they buy. As a result, companies are taking steps to make their products carbon-neutral. As a reminder, carbon neutrality means balancing out the CO2 we emit with the equivalent carbon absorption from the atmosphere. To achieve carbon-neutral products, companies must first reduce a maximum amount of emissions generated during its production, and then offset the remainder through carbon credits (financing for climate mitigation projects that take carbon out of the atmosphere).  In the coming years, all products will be benchmarked by CO2, and consumers will know exactly how much they pollute before buying them, which will influence their purchasing habits.  Carbon-neutral products and services are a necessity. But making it happen is easier said than done. It requires automated carbon footprint calculation and a reliable platform to give customers full visibility on where the carbon credits are generated. ClimateTrade helps companies to fulfil their most ambitious carbon offsetting commitments, empowering their sustainability strategy with our innovative digital solutions. After noticing the trend towards carbon-neutral products and services, we developed the ClimateTrade API, the first API REST that can be easily and securely integrated into the companies’ systems for them to be able to offer their own customers the possibility of acquiring carbon-neutral products and services during the purchase process.  And this month, we launched the ClimateTrade Widget, a tool with similar functionalities, but an even easier integration process, making it ideally suited for SMEs and organizations with limited IT resources. The ClimateTrade API and Widget provide customers with information about the carbon footprint of their purchases and offer them the opportunity to invest in sustainable projects while offsetting it. We have already  integrated our solutions into the systems of large corporations worldwide. Iberia, offset the carbon footprint of your flight The airline offers its customers to offset the carbon footprint of their flight on a voluntary basis, and when doing so, support sustainable development projects, in a simple click at check-out, thanks to the integration of the ClimateTrade API. The passenger gets the exact carbon footprint of their trip and the price needed to offset it.  Read more about how Iberia is using the ClimateTrade API Tu.com from Telefonica, buy carbon-neutral devices Telefónica recently launched Tu.com, the first online platform for the sale of carbon-neutral devices.  Reaffirming its commitment to achieving zero emissions by 2050, the company is selling devices whose carbon emissions have already been offset, taking into account the environmental impact generated by their manufacture. Read more about Tu.com Members of the Instituto Tecnológico de la Construcción de Cataluña (ITEC) can offset the carbon footprint of their works ITec allows its members to offset their carbon footprint in all types of works involved in the construction process (such as materials, machinery, transport, etc.) and at any phase of the life cycle (manufacturing, construction, use and deconstruction). Read more about ITeC’s partnership with ClimateTrade Make the ClimateTrade API your competitive advantage: integrate our technology into your e-commerce platform or payment process (checkout) and offer carbon-neutral products or services to your customers. Let each shopping cart contribute to reducing your company’s environmental impact.  Contact us to learn more about how to enhance your sustainability strategy.

Other Categories

bank decarbonization
Carbon Markets

U.S. vs UK bank decarbonization

The UK and the U.S. are both major global financial hubs, with a lot at stake when it comes to achieving Net Zero. In this article, we dive into the differences between U.S. and UK bank decarbonization strategies. Climate disclosures UK banks are widely considered to be ahead of others when it comes to climate-related disclosures, most likely because of the proactivity of their regulators. The UK Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) was the first financial regulator to publish supervisory expectations on the management of climate-related financial risk in 2019. The Authority regularly remings banks that they are expected to assess their exposure to climate-related financial risks in the way they assess other drivers of financial risks. In the U.S., the Securities and Exchange Commission published a proposal for climate risk disclosures in March 2022, and is expected to finalize it by the end of the year. These and the PRA’s disclosure expectations are aligned with the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), which were published in 2017 to help the financial sector adapt to climate change. These have been widely supported across the industry, but according to the 2021 TCFD Status Report, adoption is much broader in Europe, with 50% of listed companies having published TCFD-aligned financial reports in 2020, compared to 20% in North America.  Operational decarbonization In the banking sector, scope 1 and 2 emissions represent only a small fraction of total carbon footprint, with much more coming from lending (scope 3). As such, carbon neutrality in banks’ own emissions from operations and energy is generally the first milestone to be achieved.  In the UK, NatWest and Barclays have been carbon-neutral in scope 1 and 2 emissions since 2020. Lloyd’s Bank already uses 100% renewable energy and plans to reach Net Zero operational emissions by 2030. HSBC is also working towards a Net Zero by 2030 target for its own operations, while Standard Chartered plans to reach this goal by 2025. Meanwhile in the U.S, Wells Fargo and Bank of America achieved carbon neutrality for their own operations in 2019, while JP Morgan reached this goal in 2020 and Morgan Stanley plans to be carbon neutral in 2022.  Here it’s interesting to look at the wording used by banks: in the UK, Net Zero tends to be the preferred target, which involves a drastic reduction in emissions before carbon offsets can be used to “neutralize” remaining emissions. This target is more difficult to achieve, but much more effective to combat climate change. In the U.S, banks seem to prefer reaching the words “carbon neutrality”, which can be achieved mostly through carbon offsetting, with no minimum reduction. They reached their carbon neutrality goal earlier than UK banks, and are now focusing on reducing their operational emissions. Citi is the only large U.S. bank with a Net Zero target for its own operations (by 2030). Funding for fossil fuels U.S. banks are among the biggest financiers of fossil fuels worldwide. The Banking on Climate Chaos report exposes the ‘Dirty Dozen’, the 12 banks that have financed the most fossil fuels since the signing of the Paris Agreement. Five of those are American, including four at the top of the list: JP Morgan (US$382B), Citi (US$285B), Wells Fargo (US$272B) and Bank of America (US$232B). Morgan Stanley is the last of the 12, with US$137B. In April 2022, Wells Fargo, Bank of America and Citigroup all proposed changes to their fossil fuel funding policies, but were only backed by around 11-13% of shareholders.   Meanwhile, only one UK bank (Barclays) made the Dirty Dozen list, with US$167B of funding to fossil fuels since 2016. But even though the amount of financing to polluting industries is lower than in the U.S, banks in the UK did not fare much better than their American counterparts when it comes to their strategy to decarbonize lending. Only Lloyd’s Banking Group has made some exclusions from its portfolio: new oil field developments and companies involved in the exploration or development of oil sands can no longer receive funding from the bank. On the other hand, all large banks in the UK and in the U.S. have exclusion policies in place for coal financing, with UK institutions tending to be stricter than in the U.S. Customer carbon offsetting  In addition to the above efforts, several banks have launched carbon tracking tools for their private customers, promoting individual climate action. This is particularly common in Australia, with Commonwealth Bank and Westpac both offering this feature. But none of the large U.S. banks analyzed in this article appear to offer this option. In the UK, NatWest has partnered with CoGo to offer customers a summary of their carbon footprint, as well as tips to reduce it, through its banking app. However, few banks also give their clients the option to offset their carbon footprint. In Spain, Santander Bank has launched a new feature that allows customers not only to track and reduce their carbon emissions, but to offset them via the ClimateTrade platform. The bank has plans to roll out the service for its UK customers in the coming months. ClimateTrade’s API can be integrated into any banking application or website to present users with a summary of their emissions, calculated according to their card and direct debit transactions. It then gives customers the option to offset this footprint directly from their account by contributing to sustainable projects worldwide. All projects offered by ClimateTrade are certified by internationally recognized standards like Verra, Gold Standard of the CDM, and aligned with the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Additionally, all transactions are fully traceable thanks to blockchain technology. If you would like to know more about ClimateTrade’s solutions for the banking sector, get in touch with our experts.

Corporate sustainability reporting
Climate Change News

Your guide to ​​corporate sustainability reporting in the EU

Everything you need to know about corporate sustainability reporting in the EU: from the Non-Financial Reporting Directive to the Sustainable Finance Package and Europe’s Green Taxonomy. Since 2018, certain companies in the European Union have had to disclose information on their environmental and social impact in a yearly report often called the Sustainability Report. The Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD) was adapted into national law in all 28 member states, including in Spain with the Law 11/2018 on Non-Financial Information. But this directive is about to change, with a proposal for a Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) currently in discussions in the European Parliament. So who has to comply with these directives, and what specific information is required?  The Non-Financial Reporting Directive The Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD), published in 2014, required EU member countries to create national legislation to require companies with certain characteristics to publish information beyond their income statements. In particular, these companies are asked to report on social and environmental matters, with the aim of improving sustainability performance. Who has to comply with NFRD NFRD applied to all public interest companies with more than 500 employees, a balance sheet that exceeds €20 million or a turnover that exceeds €40 million. In the EU, this represents about 11,700 large companies and groups, including listed companies, banks, insurance companies and other companies designated by national authorities as public-interest entities. What information should be disclosed The NFRD requires these companies to disclose information about their business model, policies, outcomes, risks, risk management and key performance, as well as key performance indicators around four key sustainability issues: environment, social and employee issues, human rights, and bribery and corruption. Companies must also disclose how sustainability issues may affect the company, and how the company itself affects its community and the environment, this is what the EU calls “double materiality”. The main goal of the NFRD and the sustainability report is to help companies manage the transition towards a sustainable world economy with social justice and environmental protection. In addition, it helps to increase the confidence of investors, consumers and society in general in these companies. The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive Last year, the European Commission adopted a proposal for a Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), which would amend the NFRD. The proposal extends the scope of compliance to more companies, requires the information to be audited and introduces more detailed reporting requirements in line with the EU Green Deal and Green Taxonomy. The proposal sets common European reporting rules to increase transparency, requiring companies to report sustainability information in a consistent and comparable manner. According to the Commission, the new reporting requirements would apply to all large and all listed companies, including listed small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), though proportionate standards will be developed for SMEs.  Sustainable Finance Package and Green Taxonomy The CSDR is part of the Sustainable Finance Package, which aims to help direct private investment towards the transition to a climate-neutral economy. One important part of the package is the EU Green Taxonomy, which aims to clarify which economic activities contribute most to meeting the EU’s environmental targets. Last February, the European Commission caused controversy by revealing the latest draft of the taxonomy, which includes gas and nuclear as “sustainable” energy sources. This inclusion makes sense for the taxonomy’s mitigation and adaptation objectives, but may be counterproductive for the other four stated goals: water, circular economy, pollution and biodiversity. Now, the Commission is inviting recommendations on how to achieve the remaining four objectives. When will CSRD come into force The first report in line with the CSRD will have to be submitted by companies on January 1, 2024, for the 2023 financial year. This means that there is no time to waste in preparing for this new legislation. ClimateTrade offers a team of experts in non-financial reporting, as well as proprietary digital tools to support companies in this exercise. We can advise and guide your company through the process: get in touch.